Legal Opinion
Marcello v. Currey
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 11, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00978 (JAM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jeffrey Alker Meyer, United States District Judge
The Constitution protects the right of the people to equal protection of the laws. This case involves a challenge by Connecticut state employees to a state personnel policy that gave more generous salary benefits to state employees who would be promoted to supervisor positions in the future than to state employees who had already been promoted to the same type of supervisor positions. Because I conclude that there are rational reasons for the State to award more generous salary benefits prospectively only, I conclude that the State's policy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Armour v. City of IndianapolisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kelly v. The City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Miller v. SempleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Upstate Jobs Party v. KosinskiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021