Legal Opinion

Notaseme Hosiery Co. v. Straus

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 14, 1914No. 285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit in equity by the Nótaseme Hosiery Company against Isidor Straus and Nathan Straus, trading as R. H. Macy & Co Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

The complainant, a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, filed its bill against the defendants, citizens of the state of New York, residing in the Southern District thereof, for infringement of' its trade-mark and for unfair competition. The District Judge dismissed the bill, and upon appeal this court held that the labels were so alike that it was obvious confusion of goods must result. We sustained the charge of unfair competition. 201 Fed. 99, 119 C. C. A. 134. Accordingly the decree was reversed, and the District Court directed to enter a decree in favor of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Notaseme Hosiery Co. v. StrausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Wolfe v. National Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Wolfe v. National Lead CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  4. Wolfe v. National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API