Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. National Lead Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 30, 1957No. 29177PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD P. MURPHY, District Judge.
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found plaintiffs guilty of trademark infringement and unfair competition, and ordered an accounting of plaintiffs’ profits and a determination of defendant’s damages. National Lead Company v. Wolfe, 1955, 223 F.2d 195. In accordance with these directions, a hearing has been held and briefs have been filed. I have carefully considered all relevant evidence and the briefs and memoranda submitted by counsel. My findings and conclusions are set forth below.
The Proper Method of Accounting
The most fundamental issue concerns…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maier Brewing Co. v. Fleischmann Distilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- USM Corp. v. Marson Fastener Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Local No. 149 I.U., U.A. v. Am. Brake ShoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Hair Associates, Inc. v. National Hair Replacement Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- High Fidelity Recordings, Inc. v. Audio Fidelity, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.