Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Riley
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 26, 2001No. 01 C 318PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Nancy DeMarco (“DeMarco”), one of the defendants in this interpleader action brought by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), has filed her Answer to Complaint of Interpleader. For the reasons stated in this sua sponte memorandum opinion and order, the Answer is stricken in its entirety — but with leave granted to DeMarco’s counsel (an Assistant Attorney General) to replead promptly.
For too many years this Court has been required to treat with a battery of basic pleading errors committed by defendants’ lawyers…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Howard L. Jackson v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Heller Financial, Inc. v. Midwhey Powder Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Bobbitt v. Victorian House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lane v. PageDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Campania Management Company, Incorporated v. Rooks, Pitts & Poust, a Law Firm, and Frank Rowland, Rooks, Pitts & Poust, a Law Firm v. Campania Management Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Reis Robotics USA, Inc. v. Concept Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Thomas v. Capital Medical Management Associates, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Campania Management Co. v. Rooks, Pitts & PoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.