Legal Opinion

Chickasaw Nation v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1994No. 92-7117PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Chickasaw Nation (“Tribe” or “Chickasaw”), a federally recognized Indian tribe, challenged the State of Oklahoma’s authority to impose certain taxes on sales, income, motor fuel and 3.2% beer to transactions occurring in Chickasaw Indian country. The case was submitted to the district court upon stipulated facts on cross motions for summary judgment. The Chickasaw appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment on each of the issues in favor of the State of Oklahoma and from that court’s denial of the Chickasaw’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

I.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. SAC and Fox Nation v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Goodman Oil Co. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Goetz v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation v. RichardsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  5. Ute Indian Tribe v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API