Legal Opinion

Pilcher v. Levino

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, Kings county.' Action by Anna G-. Pilcher against Bernard Levino and others. From an interlocutory judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtCullen, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. While the complaint is inartificially drawn, and justly subject to the criticism of the learned judge below as presenting a confused statement of facts, we think it sets out a single good cause of action for deceit and fraud. Stripped of unnecessary allegations and verbiage, it states that the three defendants, for the purpose of enabling the defendants Levino and Bailey to obtain an excessive price for certain real property, and designing to cheat and defraud the plaintiff’s assignors, and such other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nichols v. . PinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Place v. . MinsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Hennequin v. . NaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Moore v. TracyNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  5. Morehouse v. . YeagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colyer v. GuilfoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Ward v. PetrieNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API