Legal Opinion

Morehouse v. . Yeager

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This was an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff, in having been induced by means of false and fraudulent representations on the part of defendant as to the solvency of one Stern, to sell to said Stern some cattle, and to take his checks for the purchase-price.

Read the full summary

This was an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff, in having been induced by means of false and fraudulent representations on the part of defendant as to the solvency of one Stern, to sell to said Stern some cattle, and to take his checks for the purchase-price. The case was submitted to the jury under two aspects : 1st. As an action for a conspiracy'to defraud the plaintiffs by imposing upon them the worthless checks of Stern in exchange for the cattle ; and 2d, as an action for false and fraudulent representations as to the pecuniary responsibility of Stern,…

1Opinion of the Court

Agree to dismiss appeal. No opinion.

All concur, except Folger and Miller, J<j„, absent.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lippman Packing Corp. v. RoseCity of New York Municipal Court · 1953
  2. J. C. Merrill & Co. v. JaegerHawaii Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Pilcher v. LevinoNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hunter v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API