Legal Opinion
New Vinita Hardware Co. v. Porter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 26, 1915No. 3974PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error from County Court, Craig County; 8. F. Park, Judge. Action by H. L. Porter against the New Vinita Hardware Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Rule 25 (38 Okla. x, 137 Pac. xi), relative to briefing a case for this court by plaintiff in error, among other things, provides:
“Where a party complains on account of the admission or rejection of testimony, he shall set out in his brief the full substance of the testimony, to the admission or rejection of which he objects, stating specifically his objection thereto. Also, where a party complains of instructions given or refused, he shall set out in iotidem ven'bis in his brief separately the portions to which he objects or may save exceptions.”
The brief filed by plaintiff in error in this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ShepardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Avants v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Collier v. GannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- Talliaferro v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Purcell Mill & Elevator Co. v. Canadian Valley Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Maxia v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Welch v. CottonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Mathews v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924