Legal Opinion

BAILEY

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1966No. 1546PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'interim Decision #1546 MA t OF Bunn(' In Exelusion..Proceedings A-13959431 Decided by Board August 9, 1966 and .7a/wary 6, 1966 An alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence but living in Canada where he is daily employed full time, who, Elmo 1953, ex- cept for a short period, has entered, and will continue to enter, this country in his spare time as a returning resident alien "commuter," regularly but not 'daily, to work as a carpenter for anyone who will employ him (some jobs last about a month, some a few weeks), and who now seeks to enter in such capacity, is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Karnuth v. United States Ex Rel. AlbroSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO v. RogersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
  3. J-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Saxbe v. BustosSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. KANEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
  3. GALVANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  4. SIQUEIROSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1978
  5. Saxbe v. BustosSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API