Legal Opinion
Saxbe v. Bustos
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 25, 1974No. 73-300PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Some aliens who have their homes in Canada or Mexico commute daily to places of employment in this country and others do so on a seasonal basis, a practice permitted by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The question is whether the practice on the facts of these cases conforms with the Immigration and Nationality Act. It turns on the meaning of § 101 (a)(27.)(B), 66 Stat. 169, as amended, 79 Stat. 916, 8 U. S. C. § 1101 (a)(27)(B), which defines as one variety of “special immigrant” an immigrant “lawfully admitted for permanent residence, who is returning from a temporary visit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. Midwest Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Karnuth v. United States Ex Rel. AlbroSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Gooch v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SloanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.