Legal Opinion

People v. Lay

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1944No. Crim. 3810PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

Elmer Lay was convicted after a court trial of the crime of forcible rape. Upon his appeal he attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt.

Defendant Lay, a tailor and presser by trade, is 30 years of age, married and living with his wife. He was driven to a café in Culver City by a neighbor, one Bullerdick, at about 8:00 p. m., and spent some two hours there drinking beer. Bullerdick left the café in the meantime and did not return. The prosecutrix, 27 years of age, weighing 110 pounds, and married to a soldier who was overseas, entered the café at about 10 o’clock…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. NorringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CassandrasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. GuldbrandsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. FryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. CallihamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API