Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Easton & Amboy Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On rule to show cause why verdict in favor of the plaintiff should not be set aside.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by ■

Gummere, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate was killed by being run down by an engine and cars of the defendant company while driving across the latter’s tracks at Bound Brook.

The defence set up was absence of negligence on the part of the railroad company or its employes, and contributory negligence on the part of the decedent.

The trial justice, in his charge to the jury, used the following language: “You must determine another question, gen*374tlemen. Assuming him [the decedent] to have stopped, or assuming him to have gone on cautiously, looking both ways,,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. West v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Klorman v. Westcliff Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Gilliland v. Middlesex & Somerset Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API