Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Provident Life & Accident Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided April 22, 1948No. Nos. 423, 429Published

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

Walter B. Brooks, deceased, was a railroad engineer and had two accident policies, one in No. 423, and one in No. 429. Each contained a double indemnity provision. The Provident policy provided such benefit, “if such injury causing the loss, shall be sustained -by the insured by the burning of a completed building.” The Locomotive policy provided double indemnity, “if the injury causing the loss occurs in consequence of the burning of the building.”

*950The deceased was a locomotive engineer. He returned to Denison from his run, about two o’clock each morning. In order to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. Ætna Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Curran v. National Life Insurance Co. of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Houlihan v. . Preferred Accident Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. AirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API