Brooks v. Provident Life & Accident Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
Walter B. Brooks, deceased, was a railroad engineer and had two accident policies, one in No. 423, and one in No. 429. Each contained a double indemnity provision. The Provident policy provided such benefit, “if such injury causing the loss, shall be sustained -by the insured by the burning of a completed building.” The Locomotive policy provided double indemnity, “if the injury causing the loss occurs in consequence of the burning of the building.”
*950The deceased was a locomotive engineer. He returned to Denison from his run, about two o’clock each morning. In order to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilkinson v. Ætna Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Curran v. National Life Insurance Co. of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Houlihan v. . Preferred Accident Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. AirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.