Legal Opinion
Town of Braman v. Brown
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 18, 1935No. 22475PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This action was for reformation of a quitclaim deed and for damages occasioned by reason of the manner of construction of a sewer line installed by the town of Braman on the land described in the deed. The plaintiff below prevailed and recovered a judgment of $4,000 from the town.
■ At the threshhold of consideration we are met with a motion to dismiss the appeal because the motion for new trial was not filed within term time. Judgment below was rendered Saturday, November 29, 1930. The application for new trial was filed Monday, December 1, 1930. Under the provisions of section 3832, O. S.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Michels v. OlmsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Administrators of Ligon v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Riely v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Gaffney v. StanardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harrell v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942