Pratt v. Cudworth

MANFORD, Judge.

Judgment was entered in accord with a jury verdict which determined ownership of *721cash monies in the sum of $4,'776.00. This appeal followed. The judgment is affirmed.

The parties are hereinafter referred to by their party designation at trial, with appellant designated as plaintiff and respondent designated as defendant.

In summary, plaintiff alleges that the trial court erred in (1) overruling motions for a directed verdict and for judgment N.O.Y. or in the alternative a new trial because the judgment was against the weight of the evidence, and (2) the admission of irrelevant…