Legal Opinion

Coffman v. Faulkner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1979No. 40574PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff brought a suit in replevin seeking recovery of a 955 H Caterpillar Dozer. In his petition plaintiff alleged that he was both the owner and entitled to immediate possession of a 955 H Caterpillar Dozer, Serial No. 60A10328, 1 that defendant took said property from his possession by seizing it from his residence, and that at the time of the filing of the petition the defendant still detained the property.

Defendant filed an answer and counterclaim for conversion. His answer generally denied plaintiff’s allegations. In his counterclaim defendant alleged that he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kreutz v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Aiple v. South Side National Bank in St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Commercial Credit Corp. v. Joplin Automobile Auction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Stogsdill v. General American Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Jacobs v. DancigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nika Corp. v. City of Kansas City, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
  2. Lacks v. R. Rowland & Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Mueller v. RuddyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Richcreek v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. DeLong v. Hilltop Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API