Legal Opinion

Moskowitz v. Prentice

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 27, 1956No. 11706PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAIM, Circuit Judge.

Chapter 128 of the Wisconsin Statutes (1951), regulates general assignments for the benefit of creditors and also contains provisions relating to involuntary-proceedings against insolvent debtors. This appeal raises the question of whether the voluntary provisions of that chapter which relate to general assignments conflict with the National Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and are therefore suspended while the federal law is operative.

On October 26, 1951, the Wisconsin Builders Supply Co. executed a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors to Paul L.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gelatt v. DeDakisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ropico, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Wisconsin Builders Supply Co. v. PrenticeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API