Legal Opinion
Ropico, Inc. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 7, 1976No. 75 Civ. 6168, 75 Civ. 6246PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAGLIARDI, District Judge.
These two actions challenge the validity under federal law of the New York State Emergency Moratorium Act for the City of New York, 1975 McKinney Session Laws (Extraordinary Session), Chapters 874, 875 (the “Moratorium Act”). Parties in both actions have cross-moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint are granted.
The Moratorium Act was enacted on November 14, 1975 at an Extraordinary Session of the New York State legislature as part of a plan to avert the impending default by the City of New York on full…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pineman v. OechslinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Evans v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Assured Guaranty Corp. v. Garcia-PadillaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
- City of Pontiac Retired Employees Ass'n v. SchimmelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis SchimmelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.