J.R. v. P.B.A.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from summary judgment in favor of defendants. She contends that this judgment was improper because the record “demonstrated that there were genuine issues as to material facts”. At the request of plaintiff, with the agreement of defendants, the parties are referred to by their initials.
Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pretsky v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Fisher v. Scott & Fetzer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wilt v. Kansas City Area Transportation AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rooney v. National Super Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Viehweg v. Vic Tanny International of Missouri, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thornburg v. Federal Express Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- St. Anthony's Medical Center v. H.S.H.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Comstock v. Consumers Markets, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1996
- Kampouris v. Saint Louis Symphony Soc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999
- Princess House, Inc. v. LindseyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.