Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 1990No. Crim. 89-0464PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment. 1 The issues have been fully briefed and were argued before the Court on January 22,1990. In accordance with the Court’s oral ruling from the bench, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court shall grant the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant Michael K. Smith (a/k/a “Smitty”) was an officer of the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) assigned to the Sixth District at the time of his arrest. He is 42 years old and had been with the Department for 20 years at the time…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Raymond J. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Robert Capo, Tadeusz Snacki, A/K/A "Ted Snacki", and Walter SnackiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Gary Lester, United States of America v. Leroy "Obie" McGill United States of America v. Gary "Geek" LesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pyramid Securities Limited v. Ib Resolution, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Jean Pugin v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Jean Pugin v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991