Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 25, 2024No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, vs. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Plaintiff, Buergofol, moves for a protective order and to quash, defendant, Omega’s, Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. Docket 254. Omega opposes the motion. Docket 290. The court issues the following order. BACKGROUND At a hearing, Magistrate Judge Duffy ordered Buergofol to identify a corporate representative for a custodian of records deposition under Federal Rule 30(b)(6). Docket 238 at 168. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shuffle Master, Inc. v. Progressive Games, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1996
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jan Vallejo v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Miscellaneous Docket 1 v. Miscellaneous Docket 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.