Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Shirvell

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 15, 2022No. 2:11-cv-11921Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER ARMSTRONG, 2:11-CV-11921-TGB-APP Plaintiff, vs. ORDER RENEWING CIVIL JUDGMENT ANDREW SHIRVELL, Defendant. Before the Court is Plaintiff Christopher Armstrong’s Motion for a Renewed Civil Judgment under MCL §§ 600.2903 and 600.5809(3). (ECF No. 253.) Defendant Andrew Shirvell has filed a response (ECF No. 254), and Armstrong has further filed a reply (ECF No. 255). For the reasons explained below, Armstrong’s motion will be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND Christopher Armstrong, a former…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Wayne L. YashinskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Van Reken v. Darden, Neef & HeitschMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. In Re Metro. Govern. of Nashville and DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Stark v. Fifarek (In re Fifarek)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API