Legal Opinion

Dick & Bros. Quincy Brewing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1929No. F-146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSinnott, Judge

Plaintiff from the year 1883 to June 30, 1919, when prohibition became effective, was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling beer. The value of plaintiff’s good will on March 1, 1913, was $119,940.10. (Finding III.)

On July 1, 1919, on the advent of prohibition, plaintiff discontinued its business of manufacturing and selling beer and engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling what is commonly known as near beer, and continued in such business until the year 1925, using in such manufacture and sale of near beer the same physical assets as it had previously used in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parmelee Transportation Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Metropolitan Laundry Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
  3. A. M. Campau Realty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API