Metropolitan Laundry Co. v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
The sole issue in this action for the refund of income taxes is whether plaintiff suffered a deductible loss in 1943 when it abandoned its San Francisco laundry mutes after the Government, in condemnation proceedings, took possession of its laundry plant. In claims for refund filed with the Collector of Internal Revenue at San Francisco on February 20, 1946, plaintiff asserted this loss as the basis for refund of the $1,599.05 .in income taxes paid for 1943, and also, by virtue of the “carry-over” privilege, 26 U.S.C. § 122(b) (2), as the basis for refund of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Grace Bros. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Richard M. Boe and Mary Lots Boe v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Boe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
- Parmelee Transportation Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Anchor Cleaning Service, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.