Legal Opinion

State v. Hahn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2001No. 99-0554-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM,

¶ 1. (on motion for reconsideration). The State of Wisconsin, plaintiff-respondent, moves the court to reconsider the following sentence in paragraph 28 of its opinion in State v. Hahn, 2000 WI 118, 238 Wis. 2d 889, 618 N.W.2d 528: "If the offender has no means available under state law or is unsuccessful in challenging the prior conviction, the offender may nevertheless seek to reopen the enhanced sentence." The State contends this sentence raises the question of what justification would exist for the defendant to seek to reopen the enhanced sentence if the defendant had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GudgeonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  2. State v. PetersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. VerhagenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  4. State v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State v. Cassius A. FosterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API