Legal Opinion

State v. Verhagen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 23, 2013No. Nos. 2011AP2033-CR, 2011AP2192-CR, 2011AP2478-CR, 2011AP2889-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMangerson, J.

¶ 1. Kim Verhagen,1 Christopher Nickles, Craig Van Asten and James Bell appeal2 judgments of conviction for criminal operating while intoxicated (OWI). In each case, the appellant contends the circuit court erroneously denied his pretrial motion seeking an order requiring the State to prove before the jury and beyond a reasonable doubt all elements of his first-offense OWI conviction. We conclude the elements of an underlying first-offense OWI need not be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal proceeding for a subsequent OWI violation.

¶ 2. Separately, Van Asten mounts a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marathon County v. D. K.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. HillaryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
  3. Burt J. Steffes v. Fond du Lac Regional Clinic, S.C.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2026
  4. Marathon Cnty. v. D. K. (In re D. K.)Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  5. State v. James Denelsbeck(075170)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API