Ward v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We agree with the Appellate Division that there is no testimony in this record to support a jury finding that defendant failed to comply with a definite notice or warning that the wires had to be removed before a fixed date. However, it was still a question of fact for the jury as to whether under all the circumstances defendant had reason to anticipate that the crane might come into contact with the wires and as to whether defendant’s failure thereafter to remove the wires was negligent.
The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Lou…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Albert Banks v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, and Ninnie Brothers, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Bennett v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Zasada v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Bennett v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Pike v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950