Bennett v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
In the course of excavation upon a sewer projpct in the city of New York the boom attached to a caterpillar crane moved close enough to one of defendant’s overhead high voltage wires to produce a short circuit which electrocuted plaintiff’s intestate. By the present action damages are sought by the decedent’s widow, as administratrix, who claims her husband’s death was caused by the defendant’s negligence in the operation and maintenance of its high tension electric lines.
A judgment in plaintiff’s favor entered upon a jury’s verdict at Trial Term has been reversed on the law at the Appellate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dowd v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Van Leet v. KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Payne v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Adams v. . BullockNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Trimyer v. Norfolk Tallow Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Haberly Ex Rel. Haberly v. Reardon Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Simon v. Tampa Electric CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Albert Banks v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, and Ninnie Brothers, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Ahearn v. Florida Power and Light CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.