State v. Puckett
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
We elect to consider first the defendant’s contention that the felony charge should have been dismissed because the acetylene torch and ladder were not “implements of housebreaking” possessed in violation of G.S. 14-55.
This statute, in pertinent part, provides: “If any person . . . shall be found having in his possession, without lawful excuse, any picklock, key, bit, or other implement of housebreaking . . . such person shall be guilty of a felony . . . .” G.S. 14-55 (1979) (prior to amendment concerning sentencing, 1979 N.C. Sess. Laws, c. 760, sec. 5).
Since neither an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. StocktonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Slade v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. PuckettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980