Legal Opinion
State v. Bassett
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 1, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The information is based on the following statute passed in 1923: “No person, firm or corporation, organization or association, shall wilfully display in or on any public building or on any street, avenue or public highway any time-measuring instrument or device, which is calculated or intended to fur-' nish time to the general public, set or running so as to indicate intentionally, or indicating intentionally, any time other than the standard of time as defined by chapter 37 of the Public Acts of 1921. Any person or any officer of any corporation or organization or association violating any…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Escanaba Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Town of Windsor v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Beach v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Travelers Insurance v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Clarke v. StorchakIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- State ex rel. Higgins v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.