Carter v. Associated Petroleum Carriers
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Chief Justice.
The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Taylor, with the result of which I regret that I cannot agree. It is a hard case, hard on the claimant, but following the old adage, a hard case must not be permitted to make bad law.
Section 72-109 of the Code, which follows, prescribes the method by which an exempt employer, such as that here, may subject himself to the terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Law:
“72-109. Employers exempted may waive exemption. Any person employing employees in the State and exempted from the mandatory provisions of this Title…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Claim of Doey v. Clarence P. Howland Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Ham v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Yeomans v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Southern Surety Co. v. InabnitTexas Supreme Court · 1930
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morrisseau v. LegacSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- McCreery v. Covenant Presbyterian ChurchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Commercial Insurance v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- Allen v. Phinney Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Crawford v. GENERAL INSURANCE AND REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.