Legal Opinion

Halstead Lumber Co. v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Rice District Court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

*193The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

The plaintiff brought this action to recover from defendants a balance claimed to be due for lumber sold and furnished to defendants. The defendants alleged payment in full as a first defense, and for the second and third defenses counterclaims were pleaded. At the January term, 1888, the cause was tried without a jury, and the court found the balance unpaid upon the lumber furnished was $204.40; that the lumber, however, was not delivered in accordance with the contract of sale; that defendants, who had contracted to furnish the lumber…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Messmore v. New York Shot & Lead Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Shepard v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  3. D. Morrison & Co. v. LovejoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
  4. Richardson v. ChynowethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cain v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. George v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Long v. American Surety Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. H. Curjel & Co. v. Hallett Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Frick Co. v. FalkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API