Halstead Lumber Co. v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Rice District Court. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
*193The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
The plaintiff brought this action to recover from defendants a balance claimed to be due for lumber sold and furnished to defendants. The defendants alleged payment in full as a first defense, and for the second and third defenses counterclaims were pleaded. At the January term, 1888, the cause was tried without a jury, and the court found the balance unpaid upon the lumber furnished was $204.40; that the lumber, however, was not delivered in accordance with the contract of sale; that defendants, who had contracted to furnish the lumber…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Messmore v. New York Shot & Lead Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Shepard v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- D. Morrison & Co. v. LovejoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- Richardson v. ChynowethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cain v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- George v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Long v. American Surety Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- H. Curjel & Co. v. Hallett Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Frick Co. v. FalkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.