Ward v. . Sewell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It hardly seems worth while to debate tbe question whether plaintiff bas waived bis right to a jury trial by failure to tender proper issues upon bis exceptions to tbe report of tbe referee when it appears on tbe face of tbe record tbat a compulsory reference was ordered without first disposing of tbe pleas in bar. Graves v. Pritchett, 207 N. C., 518, 177 S. E., 641; McIntosh N. C. Prac. and Proc., 564. Why engage in tbe fruitless task of deciding a question of procedure in a reference which eventually must be set aside? Pritchett v. Supply Co., 153 N. C., 344, 69 S. E., 249.
Tbe order of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Graves v. PritchettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Pritchett v. Greensboro Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Alston v. RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951