Legal Opinion

Ward v. . Sewell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It hardly seems worth while to debate tbe question whether plaintiff bas waived bis right to a jury trial by failure to tender proper issues upon bis exceptions to tbe report of tbe referee when it appears on tbe face of tbe record tbat a compulsory reference was ordered without first disposing of tbe pleas in bar. Graves v. Pritchett, 207 N. C., 518, 177 S. E., 641; McIntosh N. C. Prac. and Proc., 564. Why engage in tbe fruitless task of deciding a question of procedure in a reference which eventually must be set aside? Pritchett v. Supply Co., 153 N. C., 344, 69 S. E., 249.

Tbe order of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graves v. PritchettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Pritchett v. Greensboro Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Alston v. RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API