Boehm v. Boehm
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.
These are appeals on questions of law from a judgment decreeing a divorce and awarding alimony and a division of property of the parties. Plaintiff duly requested the court to state in writing the conclusions of fact found separately from the conclusions of law. The conclusions made in writing do not conform to the requirements of Section 2315.22, Revised Code, but inasmuch as we have reviewed the entire record, error assigned to the conclusions as stated is not prejudicial. Oxford Twp. v. Columbia, 38 Ohio St., 87; In re Guardianship of Zimmerman, 78 Ohio App., 297, 70 N. E. (2d), 153. Cf.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Thiessen v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- Jelm v. JelmOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re CattellOhio Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Braddock v. BraddockNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Illinois Central Railroad v. RothschildAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907