Legal Opinion

Tyner v. Neal Institutes Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 1914No. Gen. No. 18,954Published

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry C. Beitler, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

December 4, 1911, the plaintiff below and appellee in this court, H. Gr. Tyner, recovered a judgment in the Municipal Court of Chicago against the defendant and appellant corporation, Neal Institutes Company, and James E. Bruce for $2,162.60. The plaintiff had theretofore filed a statement of claim in the proper form under the Municipal Court practice on two promissory notes, together with an affidavit of the execution by the defendants of the said two notes and of the warrants of attorney incorporated in them to any attorney of any court of record to confess judgment on them. An attorney of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Snyder Bros. v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Moyses v. SchendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Magher v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Barron v. KimballAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API