In re Rose
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, District Judge.
I am of the opinion that the record supports the referee’s conclusion denying reclamation, and that so much of his order as denies the reclamation claim should be affirmed.
It seems plain to me, however, that that part of his order which disallows proof as a general creditor is erroneous and must be set aside.
The doctrine of election has never been a favorite in equity, and is only applied with favor in eases where the elements of estoppel are present, or where there is such inconsistency in the two claims as that the assertion of both of them amounts to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Parkerson v. BorstCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
- Frederick, Vietor & Achelis v. AmermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. E. Swift & Sons, Concrete Contractors, Inc. v. Sam Sanders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- In Re RhineDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1965
- Lance v. City of MissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949