Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Clement v. Selectmen of Westwood

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 6, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus ordering the respondents to recognize him as a military substitute patrolman of the town of Westwood, from which position he contends he was improperly removed. A demurrer to the petition was sustained. The case comes here both on appeal and on exceptions. The appeal is properly here, G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 96; Morrill v. Crawford, 278 Mass. 250; Peck v. Wakefield Item Co. 280 Mass. 451, and since nothing could be open on exceptions that is not open on appeal we deal with the appeal and dismiss the exceptions. Sherman v. Werby, 280 Mass. 157, 161.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Royal Paper Box Co. v. Munro & Church Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Sherman v. WerbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Peck v. Wakefield Item Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Morrill v. CrawfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Crimmins v. Highway Commission of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Caissie v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Markus v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Adamsky v. City Council of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. Costa v. Board of Selectmen of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API