Legal Opinion
Sorrell v. Thevenir
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1994No. 1992-2382PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 69 Ohio St.3d 415.] SORRELL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THEVENIR, APPELLEE. CLARK ET AL. v. QUALITY STORES, INC. [Cite as Sorrell v. Thevenir,
1994-Ohio-38.] Torts—Damages—Collateral benefits—R.C. 2317.45 violates Sections 2, 5 and 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, and is unconstitutional in toto. R.C. 2317.45 violates Sections 2, 5 and 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, and is unconstitutional in toto. (Nos. 92-2382 and 93-1041—Submitted January 11, 1994—Decided June 1, 1994.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Gallia…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jontony v. ColegroveOhio Court of Appeals · 2012