Legal Opinion

Weirzhanski v. Certain-Teed Products Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1928No. Appeal 354Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler., J.,

This was an action brought by the appellant under the Workmen’s Compensation Act to recover compensation for the amputating of appellant’s left leg, as well as for injury to the great toe of his left foot.

While in the employ of the defendant company, he was carrying on his left shoulder a sixty pound weight of linoleum which fell, 'striking his left leg and then his left toe. He went home after the accident, returned to his work on the following day, remained about an hour and since then has been unable to work. The accident occurred on the 10th of May. On the 20th of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Luckenbill v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API