Salisbury v. Chadbourne
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Plaintiff, as grantee of Abram Helms, by deed dated October 20, 1874, of his interest in the lands described in the foregoing case, brought this action to redeem from the deed to Gross & March of October, 1859, with oral defeasance, described in that case.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Plaintiff, as grantee of Abram Helms, by deed dated October 20, 1874, of his interest in the lands described in the foregoing case, brought this action to redeem from the deed to Gross & March of October, 1859, with oral defeasance, described in that case. The facts found by the court as to service of summons upon Abram ITelms and wife in the foreclosure action brought by Gross & March against them and others, are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The other essential facts are stated in the report of the preceding case. The circuit court…
1ConcurrenceRyan, C. J.
I fully concur in tbe judgment in this case, decided while I was absent from tbe consultation room. And it affords me peculiar gratification to express my ful] concurrence in all that is said in Mr. Justice Cole’s opinion, of tbe binding validity of judgments, however erroneous, within tbe jurisdiction of the courts rendering them, until reversed. This is tbe principle on which I rested my second ground of dissent in Re Pierce (44 Wis., 411), towards the end of the last term; though much better expressed in this case, especially in the comprehensive and admirable quotation from tbe language…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Barnes v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878