Terfehr v. Kleinfehn
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
The parties are neighbors with a history of disputes over their farm properties. Respondent Terfehr and others claimed appellant Kleinfehn had deliberately blocked a common ditch used by the parties, causing damage to Terfehr’s crop land. Kleinfehn contended Terfehr and others had failed to comply with previous court orders directing the common ditch be unobstructed, thereby causing him loss of crop land.
The trial court found Terfehr in compliance with and Kleinfehn in violation of its previous court orders, and awarded Ter-fehr damages. Kleinfehn appeals. We affirm.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Benson Cooperative Creamery Ass'n v. First District Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Roberson v. RobersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Cobb v. Midwest Recovery Bureau Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Benson Cooperative Creamery Association v. First District AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hunt v. Estate of HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984