Legal Opinion

Hahl v. Brooks

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1904PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District ;—heard in that court .on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Coles county; the Hon. M. W. Thompson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

delivered the opinion.of the court:

B. E. Brooks recovered a judgment in the circuit court of Coles county against C. W. Hahl and T. H. Montague for the amount of an encumbrance on six hundred and five acres of lg.nd in Harris county, Texas, in an action on the case for fraud and deceit in representing the land to be unencumbered. Upon a writ of error from the Appellate Court for the Third District the judgment was affirmed, and C. W. Hahl appealed from the judgment of the Appellate Court. t

The defendant Montague appeared but did not plead to the action, and the defendant Hahl filed a plea of…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Application of BusseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Hutchings v. SternbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Gannon, Goulding & Thies v. HausamanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Hanon v. Kansas City Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  5. Lickus v. O'DonnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API