Legal Opinion

Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Foster

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1867PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston county; the Hon. Chaeles R. Stabb, Judge, presiding. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawbence

This was a qui tam action brought by Foster to recover the penalty of fifty dollars imposed upon railways, for a failure to sound a whistle or ring a bell for eighty rods before arriving at a crossing. There was a recovery in the Circuit Court, and the defendant appealed.

It is first urged for the appellant, that the suit should have been brought in the name of the people. It is true, as counsel suggest, that the 42d section of the act authorizes suit to be brought by the prosecuting attorney in the name of the people, for the recovery of all penalties imposed by the act, and the penalties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. HowardIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Galena & Chicago Union Railroad v. ApplebyIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Woods v. DaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. City of Abingdon v. MeadowsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  5. City of Chicago v. StoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API