Legal Opinion

Hiner v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1990No. 35A02-8911-CR-581PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Defendant-appellant Gary Hiner (Hiner) appeals from his conviction for dealing in cocaine, 1 claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

We reverse and remand for new trial.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the jury’s verdict reveal that an informant for the Huntington County Sheriff’s Department and the Indiana State Police went to Hiner’s home to purchase cocaine. Hiner was not home, but the informant talked to Hiner’s wife. The informant gave money to Hiner’s wife and was told to return later to receive the drugs. The informant returned to Hiner’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Mott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mitchem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. VickersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Sarwacinski v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Sarwacinski v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API