Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Goyette

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 24, 2011No. 10-11282UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Richard Leon Goyette, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s amended final order of garnishment, which enforced a restitution order that was part of the sentence imposed for Goyette’s underlying criminal conviction. Goyette alleges that during this garnishment action he was not afforded due process, and that numerous statutory violations and procedural errors occurred. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In an earlier criminal case, Goyette pleaded guilty to one count of Threats and False Information in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(e), and one count of Threats and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United States v. Robert Rolando GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Windland v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Spicer v. Laguna Madre Oil & Gas II, L.L.C. (In Re Texas Wyoming Drilling, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Andrew ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Donald BranhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. OnyeriCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Susan PiochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States of America v. Biby Ancy KurianDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API