Legal Opinion

United States v. Evans

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 28, 1989No. 60,023; ACM S27681PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COX, Judge:

The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force certified the following two issues for our review pursuant to Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867(b)(2):

*75I

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW BY HOLDING THE GERMAN CUSTOMS OFFICER’S STATEMENT WAS INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY WHEN OFFERED IN REBUTTAL DURING SENTENCING.

II

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW BY HOLDING TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL’S FAILURE TO OBJECT TO THE CUSTOMS OFFICER’S STATEMENT ON HEARSAY GROUNDS DID NOT CONSTITUTE WAIVER, AND…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. EvansU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. ChinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  4. United States v. QuirozNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  5. United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API