United States v. Evans
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COX, Judge:
The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force certified the following two issues for our review pursuant to Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867(b)(2):
*75I
WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW BY HOLDING THE GERMAN CUSTOMS OFFICER’S STATEMENT WAS INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY WHEN OFFERED IN REBUTTAL DURING SENTENCING.
II
WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW BY HOLDING TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL’S FAILURE TO OBJECT TO THE CUSTOMS OFFICER’S STATEMENT ON HEARSAY GROUNDS DID NOT CONSTITUTE WAIVER, AND…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. BrittonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. EvansU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. ChinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. QuirozNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.