Inland Steel Co. v. Almodovar
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
*568Dissenting Opinion
Buchanan, P.J.
I dissent from affirmance of the award because there was no “accident.”1
The evidence and the findings conclusively indicate to me that plaintiff (Almodovar) was performing the normal task of his every day employment routine at Inland. He had worked there for nine (9) years and had never previously experienced a back problem.
His job as a “wrapper” of bands and coils of sheet metal required him to continuously use a tool called a stretcher, which had to be lifted and maneuvered as it became necessary to fasten steel bands around coils of steel as they moved at…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Indian Creek Coal & Mining Co. v. CalvertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Heflin v. Red Front Cash & Carry Stores, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1947
- United States Steel Corp. v. DykesIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- American Maize Products Co. v. NichiporchikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
- The Studebaker Corp. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.