Legal Opinion

Bartyzel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2003No. 01-4161PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAWSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Debra K. Bartyzel, appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The district court found that substantial evidence supported the decision of an administrative law judge that Bartyzel was not disabled because she retained the residual functional capacity to perform a limited range of light work, and that there are hundreds of jobs in the regional and national economies…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Angela M. Jones v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Dickey-Williams v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  2. Miller v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. Hibbard v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008
  4. Beauclair v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  5. Hamper v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API