Legal Opinion

Boyshform Brassiere Co. v. Modishform Brassiere Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 6, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McAvoy, J.:

The court at Special Term denied plaintiff’s motion for an injunction to restrain defendants from using the title “ Modishform ” in connection with the business of manufacturing and selling an article of ladies’ wearing apparel. Both parties are manufacturers of brassieres, which is an article commonly used in the apparel of women.

*15In January, 1921, plaintiff registered in the United States Patent Office as a trade mark the word “ Boyshform,” which design or insignia the plaintiff had adopted and used continuously in its business since July 24, 1919. The statement in the trade mark…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colman v. . CrumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Burrow v. MarceauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. American Yellow Taxi Operators, Inc. v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bennett Bros. v. Floyd Bennett Farmers Market Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API