Legal Opinion

Burrow v. Marceau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1908PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Ernest M. Burrow, from an interlocutory judgment of ■ the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant Marceau, entered in -the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 25th day of October, 1907, upon the decision of the court,, rendered after a ,trial at the Mew York Special Term, sustain-' ing the said defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The complaint alleges that one Mapoleon Sarony prior to the 9th. of Movember, 1896, was engaged in the-business under the trade name of “ Sarony ” of taking, making and vending photographic portraits for compensation, and that his work became widely and most favorably, known in the community and enjoyed the highest artistic reputation; that in consequence thereof the said Sarony had established an extensive and highly profitable' patronage and business from the public at large of very great commercial value, and the trade name “ Sarony ” had become known fai;. and wide as the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Associated Press v. International News ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. H. E. Allen Mfg. Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Montegut v. Hickson, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Chapman v. L. E. Waterman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Thal v. PolumbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API